AI for public-sector records without losing control of the record.
adapterOS runs on procurement packets, program files, case materials, and public-records workflows inside the agency boundary, then leaves legal, IT, and program owners with cited work and a replayable review record.
- MSA v4 sec. 8.2
- Addendum p.3
- Policy sec. 11
- Policy
- Human approval before use
- Record
- Kept locally for replay
The point is not a better chat box. It is a useful work record a reviewer can inspect after the meeting, audit, or handoff.
The boundary comes first.
Some work should not leave the room, the facility, or the customer network. MLNavigator starts there: local hardware, approved source sets, clear reviewer routes, and records that show what happened.
Start with a real workflow, not a platform pitch.
adapterOS is the first workspace: a place where a team can try AI on one bounded document job, see whether it helps, and keep enough evidence to defend the result.
Keep the work inside.
Pilot deployments are designed around local hardware and no routine egress for sensitive source material.
Use the right sources.
Each workspace is configured around a specific document set, policy boundary, and reviewer path.
Leave a record people can read.
Citations, control results, and reviewer notes remain attached to the work they supported.
What the product makes routine.
The research matters only if it changes how the work happens. These are the habits adapterOS is built to make ordinary in a controlled environment.
A pilot starts with one bounded workflow.
Bring one document job that already matters. We shape the workspace around the people, sources, and review standard that make that job real.
Pick the workflow
Choose the review, reporting, or compliance task where sensitive documents already slow the team down.
Configure the workspace
Load the approved sources, define the reviewer route, and set the boundary for what the specialist can use.
Use it with real work
Run questions, comparisons, summaries, and drafts on local hardware with the team that owns the process.
Decide with evidence
Measure usefulness, source quality, review fit, deployment burden, and whether the workflow should expand.
Pick the conversation you came for.
The same product supports four different relationships. Choose the one that matches why you are here; your domain context travels with you.
Explore adapterOS
See what the workspace does, what is real today, and how it gets into your environment.
Deploy it on one workflowDiscuss a pilot
Scope a fixed evaluation around a document job your reviewers already own.
Invest or partnerFunding / Partnership
Talk to the founders about the wedge, the evidence model, and where this goes next.
Test it with usResearch / Beta Collaboration
Put adapterOS through real workloads as a beta tester or research partner.
- NSF I-Corps
- ACCEL-KS Grant
- 50+ operator interviews
- Patent pending
Start with one work record your team can inspect.
Bring one sensitive workflow, the source boundary, and the review standard it has to satisfy. We will map the pilot around the record your team needs at the end.